-
Five reasons an arsenal plane isn’t the best choice for rebalancing America’s long-range strike forces
There are two basic approaches to conducting long-range strikes. Today’s force does not have the right balance.
-
US State Department must align UAV export policy with American interests
Left unchecked, Chinese UAVs create the opportunity for intrusion into U.S. systems and networks to observe or disrupt operations.
-
We prepared for war, but should have spent our money elsewhere
The greatest threats of the past decade haven’t stemmed from warfare. So why are expensive weapons systems and massive military installations still a foregone conclusion?
-
Use existing and planned craft for unmanned logistical resupply
A decentralized resupply of small, but lethal, expeditionary teams is key to defeating anti-access/area denial threats.
-
The folly of a NATO troop withdrawal decision
A reported decision by President Trump to remove some 9,500 American troops from Germany could undercut a half decade long effort to prevent war by enhancing NATO’s deterrent posture in the Baltic area.
-
Russia’s new nuclear policy could be a path to arms control treaties
The document offers a valuable window into Russia’s strengths and vulnerabilities as they appear from Moscow.
-
Why the Jones Act is still needed 100 years later
The Jones Act advances U.S. national security by helping maintain a vibrant domestic shipbuilding industry, which supplies the military with warships and transports war fighters and their equipment.
-
Poor spending decisions on F-18 could have long-term national security consequences
When budgets are tight, we pit current security needs against future security needs. That is dangerous.
-
The F-22 imperative
The loss of an F-22 Raptor during a training flight on May 15 serves as a wake-up call regarding the size of the Raptor inventory.
-
War rhetoric surrounds COVID surveillance
Technology policy has itself been warped by an overuse of misleading Cold War analogies and that’s evident in the recent language surrounding the pandemic.
-
Five reasons an arsenal plane isn’t the best choice for rebalancing America’s long-range strike forces
There are two basic approaches to conducting long-range strikes. Today’s force does not have the right balance.
-
US State Department must align UAV export policy with American interests
Left unchecked, Chinese UAVs create the opportunity for intrusion into U.S. systems and networks to observe or disrupt operations.
-
We prepared for war, but should have spent our money elsewhere
The greatest threats of the past decade haven’t stemmed from warfare. So why are expensive weapons systems and massive military installations still a foregone conclusion?
-
Use existing and planned craft for unmanned logistical resupply
A decentralized resupply of small, but lethal, expeditionary teams is key to defeating anti-access/area denial threats.
-
The folly of a NATO troop withdrawal decision
A reported decision by President Trump to remove some 9,500 American troops from Germany could undercut a half decade long effort to prevent war by enhancing NATO’s deterrent posture in the Baltic area.
-
Russia’s new nuclear policy could be a path to arms control treaties
The document offers a valuable window into Russia’s strengths and vulnerabilities as they appear from Moscow.
-
Why the Jones Act is still needed 100 years later
The Jones Act advances U.S. national security by helping maintain a vibrant domestic shipbuilding industry, which supplies the military with warships and transports war fighters and their equipment.
-
Poor spending decisions on F-18 could have long-term national security consequences
When budgets are tight, we pit current security needs against future security needs. That is dangerous.
-
The F-22 imperative
The loss of an F-22 Raptor during a training flight on May 15 serves as a wake-up call regarding the size of the Raptor inventory.
-
War rhetoric surrounds COVID surveillance
Technology policy has itself been warped by an overuse of misleading Cold War analogies and that’s evident in the recent language surrounding the pandemic.
-
Five reasons an arsenal plane isn’t the best choice for rebalancing America’s long-range strike forces
There are two basic approaches to conducting long-range strikes. Today’s force does not have the right balance.
-
US State Department must align UAV export policy with American interests
Left unchecked, Chinese UAVs create the opportunity for intrusion into U.S. systems and networks to observe or disrupt operations.
-
We prepared for war, but should have spent our money elsewhere
The greatest threats of the past decade haven’t stemmed from warfare. So why are expensive weapons systems and massive military installations still a foregone conclusion?
-
Use existing and planned craft for unmanned logistical resupply
A decentralized resupply of small, but lethal, expeditionary teams is key to defeating anti-access/area denial threats.
-
The folly of a NATO troop withdrawal decision
A reported decision by President Trump to remove some 9,500 American troops from Germany could undercut a half decade long effort to prevent war by enhancing NATO’s deterrent posture in the Baltic area.
-
Russia’s new nuclear policy could be a path to arms control treaties
The document offers a valuable window into Russia’s strengths and vulnerabilities as they appear from Moscow.
-
Why the Jones Act is still needed 100 years later
The Jones Act advances U.S. national security by helping maintain a vibrant domestic shipbuilding industry, which supplies the military with warships and transports war fighters and their equipment.
-
Poor spending decisions on F-18 could have long-term national security consequences
When budgets are tight, we pit current security needs against future security needs. That is dangerous.
-
The F-22 imperative
The loss of an F-22 Raptor during a training flight on May 15 serves as a wake-up call regarding the size of the Raptor inventory.
-
War rhetoric surrounds COVID surveillance
Technology policy has itself been warped by an overuse of misleading Cold War analogies and that’s evident in the recent language surrounding the pandemic.
